BHOLA NATH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.PANCHAYATI RAJ LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/24526/2016 · 2025-12-12
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178150 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178150 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 24526 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 12, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manjeet Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Umesh Pratap Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Bhola Nath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Panchayati Raj Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench