BABULAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
/1837/2025 · 2025-11-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178136 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178136 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1837 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri Suresh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.203 of 2025, under Sections 85, 108, 351(2) BNS, P.S. Kothi, District Barabanki.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused Kunti Devi and Hukum Singh Yadav @ Bhola who are mother in law and husband with similar allegations have been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide orders dated 15.10.2025 and 30.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application Nos. 1515 of 2025 and 1614 of 2025 respectively. The applicant is the father in law aged about 70 years.
5. Considering the aforesaid submission and adopting the same reasoning, the applicant- Babulal- is entitled for anticipatory bail on the same terms and conditions as of mother in law Kunti Devi. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. November 28, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avadhesh Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Babulal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench