Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17813 (BOM)

ATUL ASHOK AVHAD v. PRATIMA ATUL AVHAD

CA/5973/2025 · 2025-07-25

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Shri Sandipkumar C More

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 925- C.A. No. 5973-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5973 OF 2025 IN FCAST/14869/2025 ATUL ASHOK AVHAD VERSUS PRATIMA ATUL AVHAD ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sagar Somnath Ghate Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. G. Tambade h/f Mr. S. S. Jadhavar ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ. DATED : 25th JULY 2025 ORDER:- 1. Heard. 2. This is application for condonation of delay of 152 days in filing Family Court Appeal. 3. Learned Advocate for the respondent has vehemently opposed the application stating that no sufficient ground is mentioned for condonation of delay. He, therefore, submits that application deserves to be dismissed. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. The application is allowed. Appeal be registered. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ) JUDGE JUDGE Y.S. Kulkarni