HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11351 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. 2.It is alleged in the prosecution case that on 14.6.2013, the applicant along with the co-accused persona have attacked on the injured with lathi, danda and banka. The accused applicant is alleged to have assaulted the injured with lathi and danda along with co-accused Shyam Veer Singh and another. The applicant has also been assigned similar role in the statement of the injured. Role of causing injury No.1 is on the co-accused Pinku. The co-accused Shyam Veer Singh and another have been granted bail vide order dated 24.9.2025 passed in Bail No.8936 of 2025. 3.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has no previous criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 10.11.2025. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released on bail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neelu Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Suresh Singh @ Bille .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) bail. 4.Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that the applicant has no criminal history, prima facie the role assigned assigned to the accused applicant appears to be akin to those of the co-accused named above who have been granted bail, arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the period for which the applicant is in jail and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. 6.Let the applicant Suresh Singh alias Bille, involved in Case No. 2516 of 2017 under sections 307, 341, 323, 324, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C., P.S. Maigalganj, district Kheri (Crime No.258 of 2013), be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court and he shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/court concerned may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. 7.The application is allowed accordingly, on the ground of parity. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merit of the BAIL No. 11351 of 2025 2 trial. November 19, 2025 kkb/ BAIL No. 11351 of 2025 3 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench