Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178126 (ALL)

SMT. NEELAM MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/10284/2025 · 2025-11-03

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10284 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, for the following relief: "1. Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the notice/order dated 22.04.2025 issued by the opposite party no.3, contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition. 2. Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to make recovery from the petitioner as per the impugned order dated 22.04.2025, in the interest of justice." 3. In the impugned order, the authority has taken the income of the petitioner as Rs.3,11,943/- for the financial year 2021-2022. The above figure has been taken calculating the figure provided by the District Commandant, Home Guards, Sitapur for the financial year 2020-2021, which indicated Rs.2,50,614/-. The authorities have not communicated as to how this figure of Rs.3,11,943/- was reached by them on the basis of which, the benefit was not granted to the petitioner. 5. There appears to be some confusion with regard to the actual Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anupam Dwivedi Smt. Neelam Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Development Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) income of the petitioner. 6. In light of the same, we direct the petitioner to once again furnish the proper documents along with the representation before the authority concerned and upon furnishing such documents along with a certified copy of this order, the authority concerned is directed to expeditiously pass a reasoned order after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner upon the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a true attested copy of this order. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 3, 2025 Arjun/- WRIC No. 10284 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARJUN PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench