HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11015 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the revision application filed by the petitioners, which is pending before the respondent No.1. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that raising their grievances the petitioners have filed the aforesaid application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.1 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the application of the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.1 is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid application of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 14, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Srivastava, Gautam Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) M/S Shubh And Company Thru. Proprietor Smt.Sunita Jaiswal And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Special Secy. Deptt. Of Geology And Mining Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench