LAVKUSH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/1916/2025 · 2025-11-06
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178118 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178118 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1916 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.373 of 2024, under Sections 103(1), 61(2)Ka, 3(5) of BNS, Police Station Sandana, District Sitapur. 3. The Counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR, it was alleged that son of the informant had left his home and subsequently, his body was found and apprehension was expressed that the accused named in the FIR might have committed the offence. Subsequently, the name of the applicant surfaced in the statement under Section 180 of BNS. He further argues that one of the co-accused, namely, Priyanka Singh was enlarged on bail vide order dated 06.02.2025. He lastly argues that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is in custody since 09.10.2024. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the nature of the allegations levelled against the applicant, which are similar to the co-accused, who was enlarged on bail vide order dated 06.02.2025 and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is in custody since 09.10.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ranjeet Singh, Askari Husain, Digvijay Singh, Rajesh Trivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Lavkush Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Lavkush Yadav be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 6, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 1916 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench