SMT.GODAWARI v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/1006015/2006 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178115 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178115 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1006015 of 2006 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. List has been revised. None for the petitioner. Sri Divesh Mishra, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Santosh Kumar Kanojia, learned counsel for respondent No.4 are present.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, is vacated. December 16, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Chandra Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ankur Sinha, Avadhesh Kumar, Santosh Kumar Kanaujia (Irshad Ali,J.) Smt.Godawari .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Administration Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench