Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 178099 (ALL)

NEERAJ KUMAR DIXIT AND 2 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/13223/2025 · 2025-11-14

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13223 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4. Notice to the respondent nos. 5 & 6 is dispensed with as the writ petition is being decided at the admission stage itself. Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- "i. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 to consider and appoint the petitioners in terms of the order 27.9.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and order dated 28.2.2019 passed by the this Hon'ble Court. ii. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 to decide the representation dated 26.9.2025 (annexed with this writ petition as ANNEXURE No.9); iii. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 to 5 to give the work regularly and pay the salary regularly;" Learned counsel for the petitioners, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioners to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.3 to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ved Prakash Sharma, Uttam Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Neeraj Kumar Dixit And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Education And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioners are given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.3/Joint Director, VIth Region, Lucknow, is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 14, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 13223 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench