VINOD KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MEDICAL AND HEALTH DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/13857/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178082 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178082 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13857 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging order dated 22.08.2025 whereby representation preferred by petitioner for his posting in District Mau in terms of couple posting as per paragraph 5 of Government Order dated 06.05.2025 has been rejected.
3. From a perusal of impugned order, it is evident that petitioner's representation has been rejected on ground that he has already spent 25 years of service in District Mau and therefore, it is not possible to continue him in the same place for ever.
4. In view thereof, learned counsel for petitioner on the basis of instructions submits that his case for posting in any adjoining Districts may be considered.
5. In view of such submission being made, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before authority concerned who may consider and decide the same expeditiously.
6. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. December 2, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Girish Kumar Pandey, Neeraj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vinod Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical And Health Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench