Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17808 (RAJ)

MUSTKEEM @ MUSTKEEN S/O ASEEEN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5978/2025 · 2025-05-19

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:20940] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5978/2025 Mustkeem @ Mustkeen S/o Aseeen, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Bhayadi (Gadadwas) Police Station Kho District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Jail At Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Special Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pallav Choudhary with Ms. Renu Kanwar Chouhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 19/05/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.227/2024 registered at Police Station-Kho, District-Deeg for the offences under Sections 303(2), 308(2), 313, 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D IT Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main accused from whose conscious possession recovery has been made, has been granted bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court on 11.11.2024. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of the statement of the co-accused. Therefore, on the ground of parity, the petitioner may [2025:RJ-JP:20940] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5978/2025] be released on bail. No criminal antecedents are there against the petitioner. Petitioner is behind the bars since 05.10.2024. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Mustkeem @ Mustkeen S/o Aseeen shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/200