HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2007 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Anurag Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 438 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No. 147 of 2024, under Sections 376, 313, 323 IPC, PS Hasanganj, District Unnao. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant was granted the benefit of interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 3.9.2024. it is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that in the chargesheet Section 313 IPC has been dropped. The tentative age of the victim is around around 23 years. 4. Learned counsel for the informant opposes the extension of anticipatory bail on the ground that the applicant had threatened the victim for withdrawing the case. He further argues that in case the applicant marries the victim he has no objection to the grant of bail. 5. Considering the nature of allegations and age of the victim and considering the fact that they were living together since 2022, a case for anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anuj Dayal, Ankit Kumar Trivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ajay Kumar Singh, Anurag Singh Chauhan, Kaushal Kishore Tewari, Shameem Jahan Vijay Vikram Singh @ Vikki .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Vijay Vikram Singh @ Vikki be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till conclusion of the trial on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. 7. In the event of any threat being issued it will be open for the victim to move a bail cancellation application. October 29, 2025 J. K. Dinkar ABAIL No. 2007 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench