SMT. NIRMALA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/11416/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178044 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 178044 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11416 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.248 of 2024 under sections 302, 201 IPC, P.S. Itiyathok, District Gonda.
3. It is argued that the co-accused was enlarged on bail vide order dated
30.10.2025. The applicant is the mother of the deceased.
4. Considering and adopting the same reasoning, the applicant who has no criminal history and is in custody since 08.11.2024 is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.
5. Let the applicant Smt. Nirmala Devi be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Naveen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Nirmala Devi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 24, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 11416 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench