HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5049 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that investigation in the instant case has already been concluded and charge sheet has been submitted, as such, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned AGA for the State do not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 7, 2025 KU Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Mansi Saroj And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench