Cont.P.No.961 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.12.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Cont.P.No.961 of 2025 Muthaiyan .. Petitioner Vs. S. Sasikala The Tahsildar Tahsildar office Sankarapuram Kallakurichi .. Respondent Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for the wilful disobedience of the order dated 30.09.2024 passed in WP No.28648 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Sairam Kumar For Mr.A.Rajasekar For Respondent : Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman Government Advocate __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.961 of 2025 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The submission of learned counsel for petitioner is that the order and proceedings, which have been drawn on the allegation of encroachment, are not in accordance with law and illegal. 2. The order dated 30.09.2024 passed by this Court did not decide any issue. The affidavit filed by respondent shows that after eviction orders were passed under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, appeals were preferred by the affected parties. Some of the appeals were allowed, whereas some of the appeals were dismissed. Those who did not get any relief by way of appeal are reported to have been removed. 3. In our opinion, no further proceedings are required to be __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.961 of 2025 drawn in contempt proceedings. Rule stands discharged. Contempt petition is closed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 09.12.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No kpl __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.961 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (kpl) Cont.P.No.961 of 2025 09.12.2025 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis