BABAR ANSARI ALLIAS BABR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5770/2025 · 2025-07-15
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17801 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17801 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:19283 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5770 of 2025
------ Babar Ansari @ Babr Ansari, aged about 34 years, Son of Abul Ansari, resident of Village-Raghunathpur, P.O.-Aasna, P.S.-Khaga, Dist.-Deoghar.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 15-07-2025
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.61 of 2025 registered under Section 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 B, 66 C, 66 D and 84 C of the Information Technology Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and he has defrauded the victim Krishna Kumar to the tune of Rs.71,000/- and the petitioner has been implicated in this case, only on the basis of recovery of one mobile phone with three sim cards from his possession. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-12 of this bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will transfer the respective amount allegedly defrauded from the bank account of the said victim. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.04.2025 as is evident from para-11 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transferring Rs.71,000/-
to the account of Krishna Kumar and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.61 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/