SUDHIR KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY./ PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/59/2025 · 2025-11-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177991 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177991 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 59 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR/Case Crime No.0058 of 2024 under sections 376, 406, 506 IPC, P.S. Gautampalli, Police Commissionerate Lucknow.
3. It is argued that the benefit of ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted on 27.01.2025 and now the charge-sheet has been filed.
4. In the counter affidavit also, there is no material to suggest that the applicant has misused the benefit of ad-interim anticipatory bail. It is stated that the cognizance has also been taken also.
5. Considering the reasoning recorded in the order dated 27.01.2025, the benefit of ad- interim anticipatory bail is extended on the same terms and conditions as contained in the said order till the conclusion of the trial subject to the applicant furnishing fresh sureties to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned.
6. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly disposed off. November 3, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nadeem Murtaza, Ankit Tiwari, Devansh Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Raghvendra Ojha (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Sudhir Kumar Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench