JAHANDAR KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. U.P. AND ANOTHER
/1833/2025 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177986 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177986 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1833 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on anticipatory bail in Range Case No. 8 of 2025-26, under Sections 9, 48(A), 51(1) of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, registered at Range-Majhgai, District- Lakhimpur Kheri. Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant has not been arrested from the spot. Identity of the applicant has not been disclosed by the prosecution. There is no recovery from the applicant. The offence is triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant is willing to cooperate with the investigation. In the affidavit filed in support of the anticipatory bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the anticipatory bail application. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has no criminal history; the offences are triable by Magistrate, there is no recovery from the applicant and without making any observations which may affect the outcome of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Adarsh Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jahandar Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant. In view of the above, it is provided that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid Case Crime number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/S.H.O. concerned with the following conditions:- The applicant shall report to the investigating officer within twenty days from today. He shall cooperate in the investigation and he will not influence the witness. The accused-applicant will remain present as and when the arresting officer/I.O./S.H.O. concerned call(s) for investigation/interrogation. The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. The application is allowed.
November 26, 2025 Vinay/- NABAIL No. 1833 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench