HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2006 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.0397 of 2025 under sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109 BNS, P.S. Kotwali Dehat, district Bahraich. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Ashutosh Bajpai, Advocate who has filed vakalatnama for the complainant today in court, which is taken on record, and Mr. Rajeev Kumar Verma, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.Learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. have raised a preliminary objection that the applicant has directly approached this Court while filing present anticipatory bail application. He should have first approached the Sessions Court in view of the Full Bench judgment of this court in Ankit Bharti versus State of U.P. and another AIR OnLine 2020 All 694. 4.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is minor and he has been falsely implicated. The police is harassing the applicant and is raiding his house. Therefore, he has approached this court directly. 5.I have considered the submission and perused the record. From perusal of the record as well as pleading made in the bail application, no case for entertaining present anticipatory bail application Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hari Om Pandey, Ashutosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shekhar Srivastava Thru. Mother Roopa .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) directly before this court is made out. The case is not covered from the exception(s) provided in Ankit Bharti's case (supra). 6.The application is dismissed. December 15, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 2006 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench