HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6456 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No.1 -Naib Tehsildar, Manikppur, Tehsil- Kunda, District Pratapgarh to decide application dated 21.9.2022 filed by the petitioner in case No.6202/2022 ( (Computerized case No.T 202202570106202) titled as "I. H. B Versus Mangal Prasad" under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent No.1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.1 -Naib Tehsildar, Manikppur, Tehsil- Kunda, District Pratapgarh is desired to make all endeavor to decide application dated 21.9.2022 filed by the petitioner in case No.6202/2022 ( (Computerized case No.T 202202570106202) titled as "I. H. B Versus Mangal Prasad" under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dileep Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ihb Limited, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Gujrat Thru. Chief Construction Officer Rahul Jayaswal .....Petitioner(s) Naib Tahsildar, Manikpur, Tehsil Kunda, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 4, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6456 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench