Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177970 (ALL)

IDUL HASAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. U.P. AND OTHERS

CRLP/5985/2024 · 2025-11-10

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5985 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that investigation in the instant case has already been concluded and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with the liberty to approach appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 10, 2025 KU Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Singh, Brijendra Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Idul Hasan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench