Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177951 (ALL)

GOLI @ SANJAY VERMA @ SANJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY./ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. CIVIL SECTT. AND OTHERS

/582/2025 · 2025-11-26

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 582 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Ujjawal Harsh, holding brief of Sri Rishabh Chauhan, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded, and the charge-sheet has been forwarded against the petitioners on 16.05.2025. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioners, could not dispute the aforesaid facts. In view of the statement made, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 26, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar, Manoj Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Arpit Verma, Atul Krishna, Praveen Kumar Yadav, Rishabh Chauhan (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Goli @ Sanjay Verma @ Sanjay Kumar And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. Of U.P. Civil Sectt. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench