APHC010243782022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: Between: Y. Kalavathi, Dr Rajat Bhargava and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA The Court made the following: ORDER This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the orders dated 28.11.2019 passed by this Court in Writ Petition vide W.P.No.19092 of 2019. Sri Ch. Satya Dev Naidu, learned counsel, representing Sri Ramalingeswara Rao Kocherlakota, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, had been complied with. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1598/2022 ...PETITIONER AND Dr Rajat Bhargava and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): N ASWARTHA NARAYANA The Court made the following: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the orders dated 28.11.2019 passed by this Court in Writ Petition vide W.P.No.19092 of 2019. Dev Naidu, learned counsel, representing Sri Ramalingeswara Rao Kocherlakota, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, had been complied with. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER ...CONTEMNOR(S) This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the orders dated 28.11.2019 passed Dev Naidu, learned counsel, representing Sri Ramalingeswara Rao Kocherlakota, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this In view the above submission, nothing remains for adjudication and this Contempt Case can be closed. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J RR