RANJEETA JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/6486/2025 · 2025-11-10
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177947 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177947 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6486 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Dr. Pramod Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Naib Tehsildar, Jahangirganj, Tehsil - Aalapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, to decide Case No. RST/5473/2025 (Computerized Case No. T 202504040405473) - Ranjeeta Jaiswal Vs. Vidyawati Singh, U/S 209(J) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Naib Tehsildar, Jahangirganj, Tehsil - Aalapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Naib Tehsildar, Jahangirganj, Tehsil - Aalapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, is directed to decide Case No. RST/5473/2025 (Computerized Case No. T 202504040405473) - Ranjeeta Jaiswal Vs. Vidyawati Singh, U/S 209(J) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
November 10, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dr.Pramod Kumar Maurya, Priyanshi Maurya, Rahul Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Ranjeeta Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench