HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10282 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Anand Mani Tripathi, learned counsel for petitioner as well as Sri Kumar Ayush learned counsel for appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 & 3. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the cancellation of the retail dealership granted to the petitioner by respondent No. 2. 3. Sri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Indian Oil Corporation has submitted that the application for retail dealers and the grant of the petitioner was cancelled only after due discussion where the petitioner has declined to make a service lane to proposed retail outlet in terms of detailed guidelines issued by the Indian Oil Corporation. He has also placed before us a signed copy of Annexure no. 2 in this regard. 4. It has further been submitted that subsequently an advertisement was issued and Letter of Intent has also been issued to the other prospective dealer. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is provision as per Rule 17 of Grievance Redressal System to the competent Authority, under which his application is pending consideration and it is in the aforesaid circumstances, he submits that he does not want to press this writ petition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Mani Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Kumar Ayush Smt. Aarti Singh .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India, Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Petroleum And Natural Gas New Delhi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. Accordingly, in light of the statement made at bar by learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage with the liberty to petitioner to pursue her remedy available with the Indian Oil Corporation. November 6, 2025 Ravi/ WRIC No. 10282 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench