HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 2003 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 13, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rao Narendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar, Chandra Bhan Pandey, Raj Kumar Verma (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Deepika Ram Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic Shiksha Civil Sectt.Lko.And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench