HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 262 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. The present application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in case crime 177 of 2024, under Sections 308, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C, P.S. Kamlapur, District Sitapur. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. 3. This Court while granting interim protection vide order dated 30.04.2025, has passed the following order:- "1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for opposite party no.1-State. Issue notice to opposite party no.2. 2. Second anticipatory bail application has been filed with regard to Case Crime No.177 of 2024, under Sections 308, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Kamlapur, District Sitapur. 3. First anticipatory bail application having been dismissed with liberty to file a fresh vide order dated 17.12.2024. 4. As per contents of first information report, the incident is said to have taken place on 08.04.2024 at about 09.30 A.M. when the applicant alongwith co-accused is said to have attacked the informant and inflicted injuries upon him. 5. It has been submitted by learned counsel for applicant that applicant has been falsely implicated in the charges levelled against him which could be evident from the fact that only general role of inflicting injuries upon informant has been attributed without any specific role being assigned to applicant. Learned counsel has drawn attention to injury report to submit that injury suffered although on vital part is simple in nature. It is submitted that applicant has cooperated in the investigation whereafter charge-sheet was filed and does not have any Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shashank Mishra, Ashish Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Anurag Singh Mangu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) previous criminal history. 6. Learned A.G.A. has opposed anticipatory bail application with the submission that subsequent X-ray report clearly indicates undisplaced hairline fracture on the left side of frontal bone of skull seen and therefore section 308 IPC is clearly made out. It is however admitted that general role has been assigned to applicant that applicant does not have any previous criminal history. 7. Upon consideration of submissions advanced by learned counsel for parties and perusal of material on record, it appears from a perusal of FIR that only general role has been assigned to all accused without any specific assignment of role to applicant in causing the injury. It also appears that applicant has cooperated during course of investigation whereafter charge-sheet has been filed. Admittedly, applicant does not have any previous criminal history. 8. Without expressing any opinion of merits of the case, in view of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal and others versus State (NCT of Delhi) and another (2020)5 SCC 1, it would be appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to applicant under Section 438 Cr.P.C./482 BNNS. 9. List this case on 19.05.2025, as fresh alongwith service report. 10. Objections may be filed in the meantime. 11. In view of the above, it is provided that in the event of arrest, applicant Mangu shall be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid Case Crime number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or tamper with the evidence; (ii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court; (ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness; (iv) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted; (v) In case of breach of any of the above conditions the court below shall have the liberty to cancel the bail; Any other reasonable restrictions/conditions which the trial court may deem fit and proper can be imposed. 12. 12. It is made clear that the observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. " ABAIL No. 262 of 2025 2 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in compliance of order extracted above, the applicant has filed bonds and he has been enlarged on anticipatory bail. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants further submits that charge-sheet in the matter has been filed. The applicant has co-operated in the investigation and further undertake to cooperate in the trial. 6. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application, however, could not dispute the fact that the applicant has cooperated in the investigation. He further submits that charge-sheet in the matter has been filed. 7. On due consideration to the submissions advanced, perusal of the record, the fact that charge-sheet in the matter has been filed, applicant has no previous criminal history, he has cooperated in the investigation, undertaking that he shall cooperate in the trial, as also considering the dictum of Apex Court in re: Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)-2020 SCC online SC 98 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I am of the opinion that the interim protection granted earlier vide order dated 30.04.2025 is liable to be and is hereby made absolute. 8. The application is allowed accordingly. October 31, 2025 DiVYa ABAIL No. 262 of 2025 3 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench