Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177870 (ALL)

VAGEESH PATI TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1948/2025 · 2025-12-11

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1948 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.0232 of 2025 under sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352, 351 BNS, P.S.Kauriya, district Gonda. 2.Heard Mr. G.C. Verma, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. Vinay Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Anand Dubey, Advocate who has filed counter affidavit along with the vakalatnama for the respondent No.2 which are taken on record, and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.It is alleged in the prosecution case that the complainant Byakul Kishor Misra, who is Manager of Shri Ganesh Sanskrit Uchchtar Madhyamik Vidyalaya has alleged that the Principal Vedpati without informing him and the Committee of Management as well as office bearers while forging his signature and members of the Committee of Management and preparing forged documents has passed proposal for appointment of his son Vageesh Pati Tripathi, present applicant whose educational qualification is M.A.B.Ed, Sanskrit, Navya Vyakaran whereas the post is of Sanskrit Sahitya. It is further alleged that Vidyapati Tripathi has been working since 2021 on contract basis in the said subject, i.e. Navya Vyakaran. It is further alleged that the letter of appointment has been issued on the basis of Government Order dated 21.4.1998 whereas presently the appointment is being done under 2009 Regulations. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinay Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Anand Dubey Vageesh Pati Tripathi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 4.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that regarding appointment of the applicant, one Bhagwati Pujan Tiwari has made a complaint to the District Inspector of Schools who after hearing the respective parties has passed a detailed order dated 6.6.2025 placed on record at Annexure No.18 to the bail application. This order deals with the issue involved in the present first information report such as forgery etc regarding appointment of the applicant. It is submitted that the order dated 6.6.2025 (supra) has been stayed by a coordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 17/22.9.2025 passed in writ C No.8852 of 2025 (Annexure-25). It is submitted that the allegation in the prosecution case is that irregular appointment of the applicant has been made. Regarding that, an order has already been passed by the District inspector of Schools which has been stayed by a coordinate Bench of this court, referred to above. He further submits that the applicant has no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned Addl. Government Advocate and complainant's counsel have opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel. It is submitted on behalf of the complainant that while filing bail application, the applicant has concealed his criminal antecedent which has been stated by him in para 20 of the counter affidavit filed today which is taken on record. It is next submitted that the allegation in the prosecution case is of forging the signature of the Manager and other members of the Committee of Management. It is further submitted that the Writ C No.8852(supra) was filed by the President who was not competent, as per rules, to file such petition. The application for anticipatory bail is liable to be dismissed, also for suppression of fact. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of case diary submits that in CD percha No.6, the investigating officer has recorded the statement of some members of the committee of management who have denied for any meeting having been held, and their signatures. He has supported the contention of complainant's counsel that a first information report No.57 of 2025 under sections 117(2)/351(3)/115(2)/352 BNS, P.S. Kauriya, district Gonda is registered against the applicant. However, he could not state as to whether any notice or summon has been issued to the applicant NABAIL No. 1948 of 2025 2 or he has any knowledge of the said case. 6.As regards criminal history of the applicant as mentioned in para 20 of the counter affidavit, the applicant's counsel submits that he has no knowledge of any such criminal case nor he has received any notice or summon. 7.I have considered the submission and perused the record. The trial court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application has recorded the following observation(s) "अिभयोजन Šपśȋ के अवलोकन से ĥपǸ है िक बावी मुकदमा DZारा Šथम सूचना िरपोटă मȅ अिभयुǘ व सहअिभयुǘ को नामजद िकया गया है। के स डायरी व अिभयोजन Šपśो के अवलोकन से ĥपǸ है िक Šकरण मȅ वादी ũी गणेश संĥकृ त उ०मा० िवǯालय का Šबंधक है। िजसके अनुसार घटना िदनांक 18.08.2024 की है. 7.I have considered the submission and perused the record. The trial court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application has recorded the following observation(s) "अिभयोजन Šपśȋ के अवलोकन से ĥपǸ है िक बावी मुकदमा DZारा Šथम सूचना िरपोटă मȅ अिभयुǘ व सहअिभयुǘ को नामजद िकया गया है। के स डायरी व अिभयोजन Šपśो के अवलोकन से ĥपǸ है िक Šकरण मȅ वादी ũी गणेश संĥकृ त उ०मा० िवǯालय का Šबंधक है। िजसके अनुसार घटना िदनांक 18.08.2024 की है. िवǯालय के Šधानाचायă वेदपित DZारा Šबęधक सिमित के पदािधकािरयȋ के जाली हĥताWर ĥवयं बनाकर कू टरिचत दĥतावेज तैयार करके तदथă िनयुǘ करने का Šĥताव पािरत िकया तथा अपने पुś बागीश पित िśपाठी को िजनकी शैिWक योĈयता (एम०ए०बी०एड०) (िवषय संĥकृ त नDz Dzाकरण) है, (जबिक नDz Dzाकरण िवषय पर ũी िवǯापित िśपाठी संिवदा िशWण 2021 से कायăरत है) 15.10.2024 को िनयुिǘ पś िनगăत कर िदया िवǯालय के पśांक 5 व 6 िदनांिकत 22.05.2025 को Šधानाचायă व Šबęधक की जानकारी के िबना DZारा िजला िवǯालय िनरीWक गोĔडा से पśाचार मȅ उǘ िनयुिǘ का आधार शासनादेश िदनांक 21.04.1998 दशाăया गया है जबिक वतăमान मȅ उǥर Šदेश संĥकृ त माĘयिमक िशWा पिरषद (संĥथाओ के Šधानȋ, अĘयापको एवं संĥथाɛ के अęय कमăचािरयȋ की िनयुिǘ एवं सेवा शतȆ) िविनयमावली 2009 ही Šभावी है। इस Šकार Šधानाचायă DZारा Šबęधक व Šबęधक सिमित के अęय पदािधकािरयȋ से छल करके धोखे से उǘ फजȃ िनयुिǘ की है और तब से इस िनधुिǘ को िछपाये रखा, हाल ही मȅ िवǯालय मȅ कायăरत अęयं िशWकȋ DZारा उǘ फजȃ िनयुिǘ की सूचना िगली तब सĞबिęधत अिधकािरयȋ को इस सĞबęध मȅ सूिचत िकया गया है। अिभयुǘगण DZारा कू टरिचत तरीके से ũी गणेश संĥकृ त उ०मा० संĥकृ त िवǯालय िपिदन कौिíया जनपदĔडा के Šबंध सिमित के सदĥयȋ/पदािधकािरयȋ के जाली हĥताWर बनाकर अिनुयǘ वेदपित िśपाठी DZारा अपने पुś बागीश पित िśपाठी की तदथă िशWक के पद पर िनयुिǘ सीसनादेश िदनाक 21.04.1998 के अनुसार की गयी जबिक वतăमान मȅ उǥर Šदेश संĥकृ त माĘयिमक िशWा पिरषद (संĥथाɛ के ŠधानाĘयापको एवं संĥथाɛ के अęय कमăचािरयȋ की िनयुिǘ एवं सेवा शतȆ) िविनयमावली 2009 के अनुसार Šमादी है। इस Šकार Šकरण मȅ किथत अिभयुǘगण DZारा शासनादेश के िवपरीत जाकर तथा गंभीर अपराध कािरत िकया है िजससे यह ĥपǸ है िक NABAIL No. 1948 of 2025 3 आवेदक/अिभयुǘगण को Wित पɷंचाने एवं अपमािनत करने के उǩेģय से अिभयोग नही लगाया गया है। बिġक Šकरण मȅ अिभयुǘ अęय सहअिभयुǘ नामजद हȈ। मामले की िववेचना अभी Šचिलत है। अिभयुǘगण DZारा अपने अिŎम जमानत Šाथăना पś मȅ जो अęय कथन िकए गये है उǘ पर िवचार िवचारण के दौरान िकया जायेगा। िवDZान सहायक िजला शासकीय अिधवǘा (फौजदारी) के अनुसार अिभयुǘगण को अिŎम जमानत िदए जाने पर उनके फरार हो जाने तथा साĨय से छेडछाí की सĞभावना Dzǘ की गयी है। इसके अितिरǘ अिभयुǘगण DZारा िववेचना मȅ सहयोग न िकए जाने की आćया थाने से ŠाĚत कराई गई है। ऐसे मȅ मामले के तĖय एवं पिरिĥथितयȋ मȅ अिŎम जमानत का संतोषजनक आधार नहȂ है। अतः अिŎम जमानत Šाथăना पś िनरĥत िकए जाने योĈय है। आदेश Šाथȃ / अिभयुǘगण वैदपित िśपाठी व बागीश पित िśपाठी DZारा मुकदमा अपराध संćया- 232/2025 अęतगăत धारा-319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352, 351(3) बी०एन०एस०, थाना-कौिíया, िजला-गोĔडा के मामले मȅ Šĥतुत अिŎम जमानत Šाथăना-पś सं0-2747/2025 िनरĥत िकया जाता है।" 8.On due consideration to the submission advanced, discussion made above, observation of the trial court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application as also the statement(s) of members of the Committee of Management who have denied their signature(s) on the resolution, and the applicant seems to be the sole beneficiary, prima facie, it does not appear to be a case of false implication. The application is liable to be dismissed. 9.The application is accordingly dismissed. December 11, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1948 of 2025 4 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench