HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11803 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Upendra Prakash Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant as also the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No. 0198 of 2025 under Sections 121(1), 121(2), 132, 125(B), 221, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5)B, B.N.S. and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Subeha, District Barabanki. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further alleged that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. and his name has come to light on the basis of statement of the injured. It is also stated that on similar allegations the co-accused Maiku Lal has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench vide order dated 21.11.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11170 of 2025. It is also alleged that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is in jail since 01.09.2025. It is also alleged that the applicant is entitled to liberty of bail on the ground of parity. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the facts stated above. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case particularly the fact on similar allegations the co-accused Maiku Lal has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench, it is a fit case for bail. The application is accordingly allowed. 6. Let the applicant Ram Baran be released on bail in the aforesaid F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0198 of 2025 on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, on the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Upendra Prakash Pathak, Pooja Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rambaran .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (i) the applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant will not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant will appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. December 1, 2025 A.Nigam BAIL No. 11803 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench