JANG BAHADUR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./ SPECIAL SECY. EXCISE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/14652/2025 · 2025-12-17
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177851 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177851 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14652 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):-
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide the retirement benefits/dues viz G.P.F., Leave Encashment, Gratuity, Pension Arrear and Insurance to the petitioner along with the appropriate interest, in interest of justice."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e. State of U.P., Through its Additional Chief Secretary/Special Secretary, Excise Department, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 17, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajeev Kumar Singh, Alok Kumar Shukla, Anand Sharma, Sheikh Mohammad Ashif Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Jang Bahadur Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./ Special Secy. Excise Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench