HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3508 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Shri Rahul Singh Rana, learned counsel for the appellants and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State. 2. In spite of notice of this criminal appeal having been served on Opposite Party No.2, no one is present before this Court on his behalf. 3. The instant criminal appeal has been filed challenging therein, the order dated 04.10.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Raebareli in First Bail Application No. 2670 of 2025, Satyam Singh and others Versus State of U.P., arising out of Case Crime No. 0259 of 2024, registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2), 110 of B.N.S. 2023 and Section 3(1)(द)(ध) of S.C./S.T. Act, related to Police Station - Deeh, District - Raebareli, whereby the application for bail filed by the appellants had been rejected. 4. It has been contended on behalf of the appellants that there is cross case between the parties and from perusal of the F.I.R., it cannot be said that any grave offence is made out against the appellants. 5. It has been argued on behalf of the appellants that the injuries suffered by the victim are simple in nature and therefore, the Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Rahul Singh Rana Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Satyam Singh And 2 Others .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) appellants are entitled for bail. 6. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of the appellants for grant of bail. 7. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsels appearing for the parties and I find that it is admitted case between the parties that the cross cases have been registered against each other. I further find that the injuries suffered by the victim are simple in nature. 8. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the appellants are entitled to be enlarged on bail during pendency of the trial. 9. Accordingly, this criminal appeal is allowed. 10. The order dated 04.10.2025, passed by the learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Raebareli in First Bail Application No. 2670 of 2025, Satyam Singh and others Versus State of U.P., is hereby set aside. The trial court is hereby directed to enlarge the appellants, Satyam Singh, Suraj Singh and Sahdev @ Chhote Singh, on bail in the aforesaid case crime number, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- (i) The appellants shall cooperate with the prosecution during trial. (ii) The appellants shall not tamper with the evidence during trial. (iii) The appellants shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness(es). (iv) The appellants shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. (v) The appellants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to CRLA No. 3508 of 2025 2 the court or to any police officer. (vi) The appellants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through counsel and cooperate in the early disposal of the trial without seeking unnecessary adjournment. (vii) The appellants shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. (viii) The appellants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.. 11. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 12. The observations made hereinabove by this Court are only for the purpose of disposal of this appeal-application for bail and shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. December 5, 2025 Satish CRLA No. 3508 of 2025 3 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench