1 APHC010244152017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6548/2017 Between: Marisetti Ramana, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S 3. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE (AP) The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue an order direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in retiring the petitioner by way of superannuation w.e.f. 28.2.2017 on reaching the age of 2 58 years through the Notice in Rc.No.106/way v/2017 dated 21.01.2017 as illegal unconstitutional and unreasonable and set aside the same and consequently to direct the 4th respondent to continue the petitioner in service till the petitioner attaining the age of 60 years with all benefits and to pass...” 2. Ms. Priya Anvitha, learned counsel representing Sri Vedula Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 11.07.2025. ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.6548 of 2017 11.07.2025 ASR