NANMUNNA LODH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
BAIL/9200/2025 · 2025-10-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177823 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177823 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9200 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.95 of 2025, under Sections 310(2), 310(3), 317 (3) of BNS, Police Station Umari Begumganj, District Gonda. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that at about 2:30 to 3:00 AM (night), three unknown persons entered into the house and after theft tried to escape. It was alleged that one of the thief was caught hold on the spot and thereafter others were opened fire on the brother of the informant which resulted into his death. 4. The submission of the Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant was not named in the FIR. The name of the applicant surfaced in the statement of Mukhbir who stated that in the gang of the accused persons, the applicant was also included. The recovery is not even in the presence of the independent witness. 5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 6. Considering the evidence, which are based upon the confessional statement and the recovery ex-facie not in accordance with the provisions of BNSS and the fact that the applicant is in custody since 09.05.2025 and the criminal history of two cases has been explained , I am of the view Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kailash Nath Mishra, Rahul Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nanmunna Lodh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7.
Let the applicant Nanmunna Lodh be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 9200 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench