[2025:RJ-JP:31170] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5876/2025 Hariom S/o Pooran Singh, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Loriya Patti, Police Station Magorra, District Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, Presently R/o Ekta Vihar Colony, Behind Ranibag Temple, Bharatpur, Police Station Udyog Nagar, Bharatpur, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5877/2025 Parsoti @ Purushottam S/o Raghuveer, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Akkha Nangla, Police Station Magorra, District Mathura, Uttar Pradesh. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5878/2025 Balveer Singh S/o Vijaypal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Akkha Nangla, Police Station Magorra, District Mathura, Uttar Pradesh. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6746/2025 Ghanshyam S/o Veerisingh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Nangla Chhan Firava, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7378/2025 Omprakash @ Laruru S/o Jagram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Barso, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail, Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar Mr. Ved Prakash Sogarwal Mr. Kunal Jaiman For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP [2025:RJ-JP:31170] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-5876/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/08/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.05/2025 registered at Police Station Manpur, District Dausa for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 140(3) & 309(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, ‘BNS’), 2023 and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 61(2)(a), 127(2), 140(3), 310(2) & 310(6) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, ‘BNS’), 2023 and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that without any evidence, petitioners have been arrested in this matter. It is submitted that neither petitioners were arrested muffled faces nor any test identification parade was conducted by the Investigation Agency. It is contended that except recovery of Rs.5 lakhs from petitioner Omprakash @ Laruru, no other recovery has been made from the petitioners. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. It is submitted that petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. [2025:RJ-JP:31170] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-5876/2025] 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the fact that no test identification parade has been conducted in this matter, as also considering the fact that except recovery of Rs.5 lakhs from petitioner Omprakash @ Laruru, no other recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Hariom S/o Pooran Singh, (2) Parsoti @ Purushottam S/o Raghuveer, (3) Balveer Singh S/o Vijaypal, (4) Ghanshyam S/o Veerisingh, and (5) Omprakash @ Laruru S/o Jagram, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. [2025:RJ-JP:31170] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-5876/2025] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 10. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 11. Learned State counsel would be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail of the petitioners if statement of counsel with regard to non-conducting of test identification parade is found incorrect. 12. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of these bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /108-112