Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177813 (ALL)

K.B. MISHRA ALIAS KUL BHUSHAN MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13012/2025 · 2025-11-10

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13012 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs :- "(i) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the arrear from 10.06.2019 to 04.12 2024 on dearness allowance/relief on the family pension of the petitioner's wife forthwith. (ii) To issue a writ order or direction in nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of interest at the rate which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case with effect from the date it become due up till date of actual payment of dearness allowance relief on the family pension of the petitioner's wife forthwith." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 4/The Chief Account Officer of U.P. Jal Nigam(Urban), Lucknow and the opposite party no. 4 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Singh, Shubham Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Kapoor K.B. Mishra Alias Kul Bhushan Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Development, Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 4/ The Chief Account Officer of U.P. Jal Nigam(Urban), Lucknow within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 4 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of two months, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. November 10, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 13012 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench