HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1748 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant apprehending his arrest in Case Crime No. 0111 of 2025, under Sections 2/3 of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Kunda, District Pratapgarh. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that solitary case is shown against the applicant in the gang chart, in which the applicant has been granted bail, the bail order is annexed as Annexure No. 5 to the bail application. He further submits that the applicant lives in Delhi. The base case pertains to the year 2024. Now, the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case because he has criminal history of one case. 4. It is also submitted that the applicant has cooperated during the course of investigation and further undertakes to cooperate in the investigation. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application and has submitted that the investigation is going on. 6. On due consideration of the facts of the case and submissions advanced by the parties; the fact that solitary case is shown against the applicant in the gang chart in which he has been granted bail, apart from the said case in the gang chart, the applicant has criminal history of one more case, which is the base case, in which he has been granted bail; perusal of the gang chart shows that the only case the applicant happens to have criminal history of, pertains to the year 2024, but his name has been shown in the gang chart, thus the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Diwakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sanjeev Kumar Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. Another .....Opposite Party(s) ingredients to attract Section 3(1) of U.P Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 prima facie appear to be missing and in view of the undertaking given on his behalf to cooperate with the investigation, this Court is of the considered opinion that the applicant is entitled to be granted anticipatory bail in light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal and others vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and another, (2020) 5 SCC 1, subject to his continued cooperation in the investigation. 7. In view of the above, it is provided that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid Case Crime number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/S.H.O. concerned with the following conditions:- 8. The applicant shall report to the investigating officer within ten days from today. He shall cooperate in the investigation and he will not influence the witness. The accused-applicant will remain present as and when the arresting officer/I.O./S.H.O. concerned call(s) for investigation/interrogation. The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. 9. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. November 18, 2025 DiVYa NABAIL No. 1748 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench