RAHUL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/13004/2022 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177801 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177801 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13004 of 2022 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant was enlarged on interim bail on 25.11.2022. Vide the said order, the applicant and the victim were directed to get their marriage registered and file the same.
3. The Counsel for the applicant states that the marriage of the applicant and the victim could not be registered, however, they were stayed together.
4. In view of above, the interim bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 25.11.2022 is confirmed till conclusion of the trial.
5. The anticipatory bail application is allowed in above terms. November 20, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Praveen Kumar Yadav, Saquib Zia Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Santosh Kumar Tripathi (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Rahul Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench