Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177794 (ALL)

MANUJ KUMAR BAJPAI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/9140/2025 · 2025-11-06

Rajiv Gupta, Tej Pratap Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9140 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned show cause notice dated 22.7.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Lakhimpur Kheri in Notice No. D202510430001623 (State Vs. Manuj Kumar Bajpai), under Section 3(1) of Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act, 1970. 3. On specific query being put to the learned counsel for the petitioner, if the petitioner has tendered his reply pursuant to the notice dated 22.7.2025, it has been informed that no reply has been given despite lapse of more than four and a half months. 4. In view thereof, we are not inclined to interfere in the instant writ petition. 5. The present writ petition is accordingly dismissed. November 6, 2025 KU Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Singh Vishen, Lokesh Kumar Vajpayee Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Manuj Kumar Bajpai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench