Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177753 (ALL)

MASOOD AHMAD AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/11030/2025 · 2025-11-27

Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11030 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. By an order dated 28.07.2025, a Co-ordinate Bench of this High Court had passed an order on a similar writ having been filed by the petitioner. The impugned order is annexed as annexure no. 1, is delineated herein- below:- "1. Heard. 2. The pleadings in the writ petition are very casual. There is no averment as to when the petitioners visited the Sub Registrar's Office, Barabanki to get the sale-deed registered which was declined by the opposite party no. 4. The Sub Registrar has sent instructions to learned standing counsel that no such sale-deed was presented before him for registration. 3. On perusing the record, we do not find a copy of the sale-deed which may have been executed by the parties thereto as having been annexed with the writ petition. We see no reason to interfere in the matter. 4. The writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners, if any, to present the sale-deed for registration before the opposite party no. 4." 3. Upon perusal of the said order, we are unable to understand as to how Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Chandra Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., A.S.G.I. Masood Ahmad And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) the petitioner has once again filed a writ petition seeking the same reliefs. 4. Since no liberty was granted to the petitioner to file afresh on the self same cause of action, this writ petition is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. The petitioner shall be at liberty to pursue his remedy in accordance with law. November 27, 2025 Satish WRIC No. 11030 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench