Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17775 (RAJ)

JAGRAM MEENA S/O SHRI MOTI LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/7172/2025 · 2025-09-16

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:37694] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7172/2025 Jagram Meena S/o Shri Moti Lal Meena, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of 140, Pipalwada, Post Khijuri, District Sawai Madhopur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Through The Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Deputy Secretary, Medical Education (Group-I), Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17695/2024 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical Education, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 1. Deputy Secretary, Medical Education, Group-I, Secetariat, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus Dr. Jagram Meena S/o Shri Motilal Meena, Aged About 40 Years, Permanent Resident Of 94 A, Acharya Kriplani Marg, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Ms. Sweekriti Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad with Mr. Dayaram Bhasker HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 16/09/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:37694] (2 of 2) [CW-7172/2025] Pursuant to order of this Court dated 27.08.2025, the respondents have filed an affidavit of Shri Ambrish Kumar-the Secretary, Department of Medical Education, Government of Rajasthan dated 08.09.2025. On perusal of the contents of the affidavit, this Court finds that the State was justified in assailing the legality and validity of the order dated 01.11.2023 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur (for brevity “the Tribunal”). These civil writ petitions are disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by the learned counsels for the respective parties:- 1. The direction of the Tribunal vide its order dated 01.11.2023 to the extent of requiring the respondents therein to extend the appellant benefit of DACP and promotion is quashed and set aside. 2. The matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for decision afresh on the aspect of consequential benefits the appellant would be entitled on grant of seniority. 3. The parties undertake to appear before the Tribunal on 06.10.2025 at 11:00 AM. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/29-30