Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17774 (KAR)

SMT BHAGYAMMA v. SMT AKKAMMA

WP/5575/2024 · 2025-01-22

H T Narendra Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2758 WP No. 5575 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5575 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT BHAGYAMMA D/O LATE NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 2. SMT VIMALAMMA D/O LATE NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 3. SMT YASHODAMMA D/O LATE NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT KUDUR NAVAGRAMA KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANGARA DISTRICT - 561101 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JAYAKIRTHI M C.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT AKKAMMA D/O OF SRI GANGEGOWDA WIFE OF SRI K B GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS KHAJI PALYA, MAGADI TALUK KUDUR HOBLI, KUDUR POST RAMANGAR DISTRICT - 561101. 2. SMT CHENNAMMA W/O GANGE GOWDA Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2758 WP No. 5575 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS 3. SMT AMMAYAMMA W/O CHENNABYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS RESIDING AT BYRESHWARA NILAYA 1ST MAIN, 2ND CROSS HAVANOOR LAY OUT, NAGASANDRA POST HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD OPP AMMAJI KALYANAMANTAPA BANGALORE - 57. 4. SRI THIMMARAYA GOWDA S/O GANGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS 5. SRI THOPE GOWDA S/O GANGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 6. SRI THIMME GOWDA S/O GANGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R2,R4 TO R6 ARE RESIDING AT RAYAPPANAPALYA KADUR HOBLI KADUR POST MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-561101. 7. SMT KAMALAMMA D/O GANGE GOWDA W/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDING AT SUGGAIANAPALYA NIDUVANDA POST NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-561101. 8. SMT SHANTHAMMA D/O GANGE GOWDA W/O SRI SURESH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2758 WP No. 5575 of 2024 9. SRI LOKESH S/O GANGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R8 & R9 ARE RESIDING AT RAYAPPANAPALYA KUDUR HOBLI, KUDUR POST MAGADI TALUK RAMANGARA DISTRICT 561101. 10. SRI MARIYAPPA GOWDA S/O THIMME GOWDA MAJOR 11. SRI SRINIVASA S/O CHENNE GOWDA MAJOR 12. KRISHNEGOWDA S/O CHENNE GOWDA MAJOR R10 TO R12 ARE R/AT RAYAPPANAPALYA, KUDUR HOBLI KUDUR POST, MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-561101. 13. SRI V T VENKATACHALAIAH S/O THIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 21, 1ST MAIN 1 PHASE, 1 STAGE GOKULA MATHIKERE BANGALORE 560054. 14. SMT RADHAMMA W/O KG THOPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 15. SRI RAJEEVA S/O KG THOPEGOWDA - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:2758 WP No. 5575 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 16. SMT HARSHITHA D/O KG THOPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R14 TO R16 ARE R/AT RAYANAPALYA VILLAGE KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANGARA DISTRICT 561101. 17. SMT YASHODHA W/O K G THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 18. SRI PRJAWAL S/O K G THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 19. MASTER DHARSHAN GOWDA S/O K G THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R17 TO R19 ARE R/AT RAYANAPALYA VILLAGE KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANGARA DISTRICT 561101. 20. SMT SHILPA KAMALA D/O K G LOKESH GOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 21. KUM THANSUSRI D/O KG LOKESH GOWDA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 22. KUM SHREYA D/O KG LOKESH GOWDA AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS R20 TO R22 ARE R/AT RAYANAPALYA VILLAGE KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANGARA DISTRICT 561101 - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:2758 WP No. 5575 of 2024 23. SRI RAYAPPA GOWDA S/O LATE NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RESIDING AT KUDUR NAVAGRAMA KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 561101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M D RYAKHA, ADVCOATE FOR R1: NOTICE TO R2 TO R23 ARE DISPENSED WITH V/O DATED: 27.02.2024) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT MAGADI IN OS NO. 235/2016 AND QUASH/SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 09.02.2024 PASSED ON IA NO. 15 BY THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT MAGADI IN OS NO. 235/2016 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the first respondent/plaintiff submits that he has already filed a memo before the trial court to withdraw the suit. But, in view of the pendency of this writ petition, the said memo is not considered. 2. In view of the above, this writ petition does not survive for consideration. 3. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of. - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:2758 WP No. 5575 of 2024 4. In view of disposal of the main petition, all pending applications stand disposed of. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59