[2025:RJ-JP:22915] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5901/2025 Subhash Meena @ Nathuram S/o Lt. Sh. Sardarmal Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Udaipuria, Police Station Samod, Jaipur Rural. (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.) Order 04/06/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 27/2024 registered at Police Station Vidhayakpuri, District Jaipur City(South) for the offence(s) under Sections 8 and 20 of NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that alleged contraband has recovered from Shravanlal Yadav and Rajesh Yadav @ Raju and same was sold by Chitranjan Tandi. It is further submitted that on the stance of statement made by Shravanlal Yadav and Rajesh Yadav, the accused-petitioner and Ashish Kumawat was arrested in this case. The contraband which was recovered from Shravanlal Yadav and Rajesh Yadav @ Raju is [2025:RJ-JP:22915] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5901/2025] less than commercial quantity. He further submitted that conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Petitioner is behind the bars since 15.04.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record, the contraband was recovered from Shravanlal Yadav and Rajesh Yadav @ Raju and both of them were enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide common order dated 12.02.2024. Furthermore, Ashish Kumawat has also enlarged on bail vide order dated 05.03.2024 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.2302/2024. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Subhash Meena @ Nathuram is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of the bail granted by [2025:RJ-JP:22915] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5901/2025] this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station in the 1st week of every month, till trial is concluded. If breach of any of these conditions, is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J CND/AVG/108