ROHIT MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/12655/2024 · 2025-11-12
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177717 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177717 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12655 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 105 of 2024, under sections 363, 366, 376(DA) IPC and Sections 5/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Alambagh, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the applicant used to stay as a neighbor near informant's home. On 1.6.2024 the daughter of the informant was taken by him to home of one Sandeep Jaiswal and thereafter wrong was committed on her. In the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. the victim stated that she had gone alongwith applicant to the home of one Sandeep who was her uncle and wrong was committed while uncle was at home. There is no definite document with regard to exact age of the victim. Medical on record does not corroborate the allegations. The FIR was also lodged after a delay of five days. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the medical report on report and the delay in lodging the FIR, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 7.6.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Brijesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Arun Kumar, Krishna Gopal Rohit Maurya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Rohit Maurya be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 12, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 12655 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench