THOMAS COOK INDIA PVT. LTD. v. SRI.CONUGOVI SUDEENDRA RAO
WP/4874/2025 · 2025-02-19
R Devdas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17770 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17770 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7445 WP No. 4874 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 4874 OF 2025 (GM-CON)
BETWEEN:
THOMAS COOK INDIA PVT. LTD.
NO 70, 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR THOMAS COOK BUILDING, M G ROAD, NEAR M G ROAD METRO STATION BENGALURU 560001 RE BY ITS AUTHROISED SIGNATORY DILEEP KUMAR …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMAKRISHNAN S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI.CONUGOVI SUDEENDRA RAO S/O LATE C KRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT NO K 204, PURVA HIGHLANDS NEAR HOLIDAYS VILLAGE MALLASANDRA, BENGALURU 560062 …RESPONDENT
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE KARNATAKA CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION (KSCDRC), TO HEAR APPEAL NO. SC/29/FA/157/2025, PENDING ON ITS FILE, ON THE DATE FIXED BY THIS HONORABLE COURT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7445 WP No. 4874 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER Notice to the respondent is not necessary for the following reasons.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has suffered an order and award passed at the hands of the IV Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bengaluru. However, the petitioner has also filed an appeal before the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Appeal No.SC/29/FA/157/2025 on 13.02.2025 along with the statutory deposit. Nevertheless, the grievance of the petitioner is that although the appeal has been filed and the statutory deposit is made, the matter is not being considered either for admission or for interim prayer. Therefore, the learned counsel submits that the matter may be disposed of with a specific direction to the Commission to take up the matter for admission and consider the interim prayer made as expeditiously as
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7445 WP No. 4874 of 2025
possible, since the respondent has initiated execution of the orders passed by the District Consumer Commission.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of requesting the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to take up the appeal filed by the petitioner in Appeal No.SC/29/FA/157/2025 and consider the same for admission and for interim relief, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. Having regard to the grievance made out by the petitioner, the execution authority is also hereby directed not to precipitate the matter till the matter is taken up by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, in terms of the directions issued by this Court.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY CT: JL