IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5066 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2024 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai ====================================================== GOLU SINGH S/o- Late Ramsharan Singh R/v- Ramdiri Tola Mahaji Ps- Matihani Dist- Begusarai ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. Arun Paswan S/o- Late Kirandev Paswan R/v- Ramdiri Mahaji W.No-9, Ps- Matihani Dist- Begusarai ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Shaishav Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 23-04-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Excise Judge, SC/ST (POA) Court, Begusarai whereby the bail application of the appellant in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 167 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 103(1) of the BNS, under Section 27 of the Arms Act and under Sections 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (POA) Act, was rejected. 3. The appellant is accused of killing the deceased. 4. The appellant is in custody since 01.07.2025. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5066 of 2025(3) dt.23-04-2026 2/2 that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. 6. Learned Special P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellant and has submitted that during investigation, it has come that the appellant has fired upon one Ravi Shankar Singh when a dispute took place between them but the bullet hit the deceased. He further submits that the appellant is accused in 19 more cases out of which he has been acquitted in 6 cases meaning thereby, the appellant is still accused in 13 more cases. 7. Considering the allegation and the antecedent of the appellant, this court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. 8. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U