RAM KRIPAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/4774/2025 · 2025-11-27
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177695 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177695 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4774 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Vindeshwri Pandey, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 255 of 2024 under sections 110, 115(2), 351(2), 352, 105 BNS, P.S. Bazar Shukla, District Amethi.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that four persons were accused of causing the offence in question in which general allegations were levelled against all the accused. It is also argued that 3 of the co accused have been enlarged on bail. Copies of the bail orders are annexures RA-1, RA-2 and RA-3 to the rejoinder affidavit.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and adopting the same reasoning, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 10.10.2024 and has no pending criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ram Kripal be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Arjun Kumar Kaushal, Vindeshwri Pandey Ram Kripal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 27, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 4774 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench