MANOJ KUMAR @ MANOJ KASHYAP AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/10422/2025 · 2025-12-11
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177691 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177691 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10422 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Smt. Nivedita Gupta, Advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed mainly with the prayer to quash the impugned Charge Sheet No.01/2020, dated 09.02.2020 as well as summoning order dated 20.03.2021, in Case No.14103/2021 (State Vs. Manoj Kashyap and another), in Crime No.09/2020, Under Section 323, 504, 506 IPC relating to Police Station -Krishna Nagar, District-Lucknow, pending in the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII, Lucknow including entire proceedings initiated in pursuance thereof, contained in Annexure No.1 and 2 to the Petition. quashing of the aforesaid Case No.14103/2021 (State Vs. Manoj Kashyap and another) has also been prayed. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which is said to have taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as ANNEXURE NO. 4 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the parties concerned to appear before the trial court concerned within 2 weeks from today alongwith original compromise and the trial court is directed to verify the compromise within next 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jay Kumar Soni Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Kashyap And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8.
For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if it has been filed, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 11, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 10422 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench