AWADHESH KUMAR OMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU.ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME GOVT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1167/2025 · 2025-10-30
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177687 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177687 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1167 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.33 of 2023 under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., P.S. SIT, Police Headquarters, district Lucknow. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.It is alleged in the prosecution case that the applicant who is proprietor of M/s Omar Tenders & Construction in connivance with the authorities of U.P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Limited during constructions of Rajkiya Alopathic Medical College has forwarded forged bill and thus has caused financial loss to the tune of Rs.14,90,753.24. 4.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated, with no criminal history. Although, the firm is registered in his name, however the applicant has supplied all the material as per supply order. The co-accused Amit Kumar Singhania has been granted anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 9.7.2025 passed in Anticipatory Bail No.258 of 2025. The applicant seeks parity. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Awadhesh Kumar Omar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru.Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Learned counsel for the applicant undertakes that the applicant shall cooperate in the investigation. 5.Learned Addl. Government Advocate has opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel but could not dispute the argument advanced by
learned counsel for the applicant. 6.Considering the above aspects of the matter, the fact that the applicant has no criminal history, the undertaking given on behalf of the applicant that he will cooperate in the investigation/trial, investigation is going on, the co-accused named above has been granted anticipatory bail, the
judgment in Sushila Aggarwal and others versus State (NCT of Delhi) and another (2020)5 SCC 1, and without entering into the merit of the case, it would be appropriate to grant protection to the applicant. 7.In view of the above, it is provided that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. 8.The applicant shall cooperate in the investigation/trial and he will not influence the witnesses. In case of default, it would be open for the investigating agency/trial court to proceed in accordance with law. October 30, 2025 kkb/ ABAIL No. 1167 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench