SALAUDDIN @ LALA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/7314/2025 · 2025-10-29
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177686 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177686 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7314 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. 2.It is alleged in the prosecution case that on the basis of secret information, the police has apprehended the accused applicant. From his personal search, Rs.2000/- cash and 14 fire arms and about 75 bullets/cartridges along with other fire arm equipment have been recovered. On his pointing out, a number of fire arms and cartridges have been recovered from public place. 3.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the residence of the applicant is less than 100 meters from the police station Malihabad, Lucknow and the recovery is made from a place, i.e. 50 metres away from police station Malihabad. The recovery is highly suspicious. There is no public witness to the alleged recovery. The applicant is 68 years of age. The offence is triable by Magistrate. The applicant is in jail since
27.6.2025. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released on bail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. 4.Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abdul Ahad, Prabhat Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Salauddin @ Lala .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant is 68 years old, charge sheet has been filed, the offence is triable by Magistrate,
arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the period for which the applicant is in jail and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. 6.Let the applicant Salauddin alias Lala, involved in Case Crime No.142 of 2025 under sections 3, 4, 5, 25 Arms Act, P.S. Malihabad, district Lucknow be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A I.P.C. (now 269 BNS) (vi) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in
order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (now 84 BNSS) is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on BAIL No. 7314 of 2025 2
the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A I.P.C. (now 209 BNS). 7.The application is allowed accordingly. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merit of the trial.
October 29, 2025 kkb/ BAIL No. 7314 of 2025 3 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench