Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177662 (ALL)

SMT. VIDYA DEVI v. MISHRI LAL MAURYA AND ANOTHER

SAPL/95/2016 · 2025-11-07

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SECOND APPEAL No. - 95 of 2016 Court No. - 19 HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J. 1. On earlier dated, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 has informed that the sole appellant as well as the respondent no.1 has died long ago but no steps have been taken for bringing on record the legal heirs/ representatives of the appellant as well as the respondent no.1. 2. Even legal representatives of deceased appellant have not put in appearance to file application for substitution in respect of sole appellant and respondent no.1. 3. As a statutory period of 90 days appears to have been lapsed and no application for substitution is forthcoming from the side of legal representatives of the appellant. 4. In view of above, the present appeal stands dismissed as abated. November 7, 2025 Mohd. Sharif Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Prabhakar Vardhan Chaudha Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajay Pandey (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) Smt. Vidya Devi .....Appellant(s) Mishri Lal Maurya And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench